<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>2</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>McGuinness, Kevin</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>O'Connor, Noel E. (Supervisor).</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2010</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Image segmentation, evaluation, and applications</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>PhD Thesis, Dublin City University</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Dublin, Ireland</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>RP4</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p&gt;This thesis aims to advance research in image segmentation by developing  robust techniques for evaluating image segmentation algorithms. The key  contributions of this work are as follows. First, we investigate the  characteristics of existing measures for supervised evaluation of  automatic image segmentation algorithms. We show which of these measures  is most effective at distinguishing perceptually accurate image  segmentation from inaccurate segmentation. We then apply these measures  to evaluating four state-of-the-art automatic image segmentation  algorithms, and establish which best emulates human perceptual grouping.  Second, we develop a complete framework for evaluating interactive  segmentation algorithms by means of user experiments. Our system  comprises evaluation measures, ground truth data, and implementation  software. We validate our proposed measures by showing their correlation  with perceived accuracy. We then use our framework to evaluate four  popular interactive segmentation algorithms, and demonstrate their  performance. Finally, acknowledging that user experiments are sometimes  prohibitive in practice, we propose a method of evaluating interactive  segmentation by algorithmically simulating the user interactions. We  explore four strategies for this simulation, and demonstrate that the  best of these produces results very similar to those from the user  experiments.&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
	<URL>http://doras.dcu.ie/14998/</URL>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>